Sunday, March 24, 2013

A better Malaysia, a Far-Fetch Dream?


I am delighted every time I bump into Malaysian in Brisbane Australia. I guess due to our small population, we are more bonded and united than we might be back in home country. We love a chat about life and somehow our conversation will always drift to discussion about current situation in Malaysia and how we miss the great Malaysian food that we used to take for granted.

                I can reassure the government officials that are so paranoid about the situation of brain drain that Malaysian in Australia still loves our country of origin.  I can also say with deep conviction that, no matter how hard we try to act like Aussie or mask our identity by changing our accent, deep inside our heart we are still a Malaysian. Put it this way, we are proud to be a Malaysian, but many would hesitate to say that they are proud of the situation in Malaysia and the direction the country is heading.

                The conversation always circulating around a few issues:

aa)      The corruption in our country
Even though we are far away, we can still glean from the news that corruption is still somehow rampant in Malaysia. This ranges from the ‘cows issues’ which saw billion being embezzled from the original purpose for which it is allocated; the submarine case where again billions of dollars are ‘lost’ in the process of acquiring the submarine which turn out to be malfunction; the 40 million that was paid to SABAH political party with no legitimate purpose other than so called political donation; millions spent for so called ‘ lawatan sambil belajar’ to overseas, and the lists go on…

bb)      The increased tension and confrontation between BN and Pakatan Rakyat

Many will tell me that they are sick of the way both side across the political divide try to polarise every issues. BN will always try to paint a rosy picture by saying how successful is the government 
 transformation program and the Opposition will always find fault with whatever the government is doing. Many I spoke to will asked , ‘ why must they argue over every issues and why can’t they all sit down and discuss , after all, whatever they do is supposed to be in the best interest of the rakyat .’

There are also many who voice their frustration over how some quarters use violent tactics to assert their political dominance. There have been numerous interests of violence used by certain political party’s supporters against the people who turn up for ceramah or political gathering of opposition. 

There are also distrust against Pakatan Rakyat government and many would view them in cynical. Many will also say that Pakatan will tend to be corrupt just like BN one day and what is a point of change ?

cc)       The economic problem

One of the perennial problem that are haunting all Malaysian are the increasing cost of living. Many will feel the heat of price hikes even though the government try to deny that inflation is a problem facing the country. This happens against the backdrop of reduced rate of subsidies by the government. This problem is intensified by low wages. Malaysian in Australia will always cite the minimum wages system. 

Even though things are expensive in Australia and inflation is also a problem, at least the wages could cope with the rising living cost. For example, a blue collar worker will earn like AUD 20 -25 per hour. This is in stark contrast with minimum wage system in Malaysia where ordinary Malaysian blue collar worker who are mandated to be paid RM 900 minimum each months.

Many are also disenchanted by the BR1M which are perceived as short term ‘sweat’ given out by the government. I cannot deny that RM 500 might be helpful for many families but the lingering question is whether this is sustainable.  Malaysian overseas is more concern about the large national debt approaching 54 % of the GDP. Our budget has been in deficit for over a decade and we are spending more that we can afford. 

dd)      The standard of living in Malaysia
We are all grateful for the effective transport system in Australia. Public transport and regular and reliable.  This seems to be in stark contrast to Malaysia public transport where punctuality and reliability is a big problem.  This results in Malaysian having to buy cars and this cause constant traffic jam and air pollution.

In addition, many will tell me how safe they will in Australia compared to Malaysia. At least we can walk safely in night and along the road in Australia without being worry of the snatch thief. However, this is only true to a certain extent as there are certain areas in Australia that have higher crime rate but at least we know that we are generally safe.

We can lament over and over again about the problem plaguing our country. However, very often we are only interested in complaining without thinking of how to solve the problem. Often I have to endured long-winded complain from fellow Malaysian and when I asked them for solution to the problem, they either look at me with a  blank face or reply with a sigh , ‘ its always like that lah, there is no hope la.’

Being me, I start to think why are we at the situation where we are now? We used to be more advance than countries like korea and Japan. We even beat them in Football. I always ask myself how we could have been different. After some serious contemplation and research, I have identified the cause of the problem and how they can make a different:

a1)      Institution
In Australia, the judiciary system has to be independent from other arm of government. This is necessary to provide check and balances against arbitrary use of power by the government. In Mabo v Queensland  , the High Court invalidated the legislation enacted by the Queensland government that invalidated all land claim by the aboriginal people. The court held in Mabo (NO 2) that aboriginal people hold a native title and the extinguishment of their land rights are subject to the racial discrimination act 1975. 

In Malaysia, the judiciary system has been undermined by the sacking of 5 judges in 1988 including the Chief justice.  Constitutional amendment was also pass to amend article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution that undermine the independence of the judiciary system. 

Moreover, there are many independent bodies and agencies that check on the exercise of power by the government officials. For example, the police commission will be checking on the conduct of the police and complaints can be made by the public against misconduct by police officials. In addition, independent body are often instituted to look into certain matter. For example, the Fitzgerald inquiry reveals much misconduct by Queensland police officials and many recommendations were adopted by the government at that time.

In addition, Attorney general Chamber ( AG) and Anti –corruption agency are independent from the executive power. We have seen prosecution of many government officials. The most recent prosecution of Craig Thompson who are in charge of union and fair work Australia was charged with Fair Work Australia alleges the federal NSW MP misused union funds when he was the Health Services Union national secretary between 2002 and 2007, by using credit cards to spend thousands of dollars on personal expenses, including prostitutes.

So far we have not seen Government minister being charged for ‘cow’s scandal’ nor have we see prosecution of top government officials involving in the purchase of the faulty submarine.
This is the main cause of the corruption problem that we have in Malaysia. Moreover, the lack of institutional check and balances also cause misuse of power by law enforcer particularly the police forces. When we look at the problem further, ineffective fight against crime has its root in the lack of checks on police power. Very often we are informed that many police officers are stuck with administrative work and only very few detective and police that go around enforcing the law. If a police commission was instituted, at least the commission can look into ways of improving the efficiency of the police officers and prevent them from misusing the power

If the MACC is more effective and independent in fighting corruption, more money will be spent on improving the life of the people and we will not be stuck with poor economy.
Hence, the first way to make Malaysia a better country is to ensure that we have independent agency that check on executive power.

bb)      Cultural Norm
In Malaysia, we are so used to bribery that we seem to tolerate it and accept it as part of the ways ‘things are done’. We even think that it is legitimate for government officials to take in bribe as long as it is not too obvious or too much. 

Our ‘ taka apa’ attitude has caused us a great deal in legitimizing the taking of bribery. There is once a New Zealand Minister that is forced to resign for using the tax payer money to pay for the expenses of her husband when they travel overseas for work. This might see preposterous for Malaysian who may say , ‘alah, tak apa la, sikit je.’ 

We need to change the way we think by saying NO for any form of bribery and corruption. We must insist that no mean no and there are no leeway for getting around it.

cd)       Accountability and Transparency

Very often, government officials are not accountable to the people for their actions. As any government’s action and policies will have potential big impact on rakyat, the government must take responsibility for its mistakes. For example, we have stadium and bridges that collapse and no government officials are penalized for their mistake. 

In addition, the government are not transparent in its operation. In this regard, the government often formulated and implemented policies without consultation with the people. For example, development and acquisition of land in PENGERANG was carried out without consulting the locals.
As a result of lack of accountability and transparency, many of the policies were against the interest of the people and this result in economic inefficiency in the form of wastage.  

Government must start to recognise the need to be accountable to the people and take responsibility for any poor policies

de)       Deliberative Democracy
Winston Churchil once said that ‘democracy is the worst form of government except all those other system of governance that had been tried.’

It is true that democracy can lead to confrontation and polarise the society. However mature democracy with two party system provides the necessary checks and balances against government’s action.
Believe me or not, human nature tends to be greedy and our desire and thirst for power are never quenched. The failure of other system such as monarchy and communism is rooted in the weakness of human nature. This happens when a man has the supreme power and there are no one to check his exercise of power. As a result, we have Stalin, Mao Tze Dong, Hitler who are seen as great leader with supreme power but tend to misuse their power for self-glory, greed and desire.  They either become too overzealous in their pursuit of glory at the expense of the people or blinded by power and lost sight of their original aim to the betterment of the people.

To prevent overzealous exercise of power and to curb weakness of human nature, democracy provide two party systems where the government will be checked by the opposition to ensure the government does not neglect the interest of the people.
Democracy also provide a platform for the people to voice their opinion . Even though we might see confrontation among political party across the divide, we can view it positively as a way to ensure that the problem are not swept under the carpet and that the government cannot do whatever it wishes. 

However, focusing on the part of confrontation and clashes of ideas in democracy totally miss the greater benefit that democracy can bring. At the core of the idea of democracy is that people must come first and the interest of the people must always be prioritized. Hence, in mature democracy, deliberation become a norm where political across the political divide and put aside all their differences in the interest of the rakyat and try to seek consensus. The opposition will not oppose for the sake of opposing and will support the great idea proposed by the government. The government , on the other hand, will not dismiss whatever proposed or opposed by the government with contempt and will tend to listen to the voice of the dissent. 

However, looking at how things are in Malaysia, I believe we still have a long way to go to achieve mature democracy and discard confrontation in favour of deliberation and collaboration. Hence, we must not lose hope when we see the tension between BN and Pakatan Rakyat. Instead, we must hold true to the belief that this is a transition process and hopefully one day we can have both sides working together for the betterment of the rakyat. However, what Malaysia now need is a two party system which provides an alternative for the people. 

I cannot deny the fact that Pakatan Rakyat might be corrupted and incompetent one day. After all, power tend to corrupt. However, we must also bear in mind that absolute power corrupt absolutely . The beauty of democracy with two party system is that beside providing check and balances, it provide an alternative to the rakyat to choose who to govern them. For example, if one day Pakatan Rakyat is really corrupted, at least the people has an option to choose BN to govern them back.

In conclusion, I still love Malaysia and I believe we are going to be a better country in the future. But until then, let us not lost faith. No matter how bad things are back in Malaysia, we must be proud that we are Malaysian we bear the hope for a better future for our children. The wost thing that can happen to anyone is to be apathetic and lost hope. Remember always to look at the sun and you will never see the shadow.